BIND 9 (Re: ISC Patches)
Len Sassaman
rabbi at quickie.net
Wed Sep 17 18:25:40 UTC 2003
On Wed, 17 Sep 2003, Paul Vixie wrote:
> it's under consideration now. bind8 is not a priority for the bind forum,
> and isc would rather put it in feature-freeze, but we're looking into it.
> bind9's internals make "delegation-only" easy to implement. bind8's
> internals are pretty twisty.
This would certainly be appreciated. I have my BIND 8 name servers patched
with a modified version of this:
http://sam.zoy.org/writings/internet/verisign/patch-bind-8.4.1.0-dickhead.diff
... but it certainly isn't as clean as I'd like.
--Len.
More information about the NANOG
mailing list