BMITU
Robert Boyle
robert at tellurian.com
Thu Sep 4 21:26:15 UTC 2003
At 02:35 PM 9/4/2003, Brad Knowles wrote:
and most *nix platforms, look at Surgemail from http://www.netwinsite.com
>> It is incredibly scalable and VERY fast.
>
> Got any benchmarks?
We have tested all of them. We process several million messages per day for
tellurian.com. The only server which doesn't die immediately or within
30-60 minutes is Surgemail. All others are crippled by multi-threaded and
multi-homed dictionary attacks very quickly. I am speaking only of Win32
servers. That is what he asked for.
>> It uses a spam assassin-like
>> filter which is written in C so it is at least 20-100 times faster than
>> spam assassin and 95% as effective.
>
> Again, benchmarks, please.
Spam assassin could not handle the load and choked on the mail volume. We
were only able to process 1-2 messages per second with spam assassin. (not
running spamc/spamd since it doesn't work on Win32) We can now peak at
50-100 messages per second without any problem. The ruleset is completely
customizable and it includes a distributed razor-like checksuming spamtrap
database. Even without Bayes capability, with thousands of messages per
day, I only receive one or two false positves or false negatives per week.
> In particular, I'd also like to see effectiveness benchmarks,
> such as the ones recently reported at
> <http://freshmeat.net/articles/view/964/>. Here, SpamAssassin won as a
> non-learning filter, but it also has a Bayesian/learning mode that would
> allow it to perform as well as or better than any of the other learning
> types. Of course, they tested version 2.55 and 2.60 is already
> available, so that would also make a difference.
Unfortunately, spam assassin is so effective and popular that spammers are
using the rules to game SA now. We use a different ruleset than SA so we
are less susceptible to forced false negatives.
>> It includes support for AVAST
>> anti-virus
>
> Any other anti-virus solutions supported? AMaViS and amavisd-new
> support something like thirty different plug-in modules that you can use.
Sure. You can use any command line scanner. Norton, McAfee, RAV,
whatever... We were using RAV until a week ago when we decided to switch to
AVAST.
>> and the webmail program is powerful, fast, and includes
>> support for PGP.
>
> Webmail is another aspect of the overall system. Myself, I've
> found that many webmail systems are too dependant on support for
> javascript in the browser. In particular, IMP/horde has a problem in
> this area. We found that TWIG was the best webmail application we could
> find, although I've also heard good things about SquirrelMail. There are
> many others also listed at
> <http://directory.google.com/Top/Computers/Software/Internet/Clients/Mail/Web-Based/>.
It is a standard IMAP/POP/SMTP server so you can use any webmail you want.
The one which is included is very fast and powerful. It includes almost any
feature a full featured email client should have. View source, view
headers, PGP, redirect, rules, anti-spam rules and exceptions.
>> It is an AWESOME product and the support and
>> developers are top notch too. I don't have any vested interest in
>> the company, but I am a very happy customer. (They also make DNews
>> which many people here are probably familiar with)
>
> DNews I am familiar with. Not bad for what it is, but Diablo is
> much more scalable. It's also more difficult to manage, but the best-run
> large news providers in the world that I know of are all using Diablo.
Many also use Cyclone and Typhoon too. I didn't say that DNews was the most
scalable server, but that people would know the company by it. :) I haven't
wasted my time or bandwidth running a news server for many years so I can't
comment on news server scalability.
-Robert
Tellurian Networks - The Ultimate Internet Connection
http://www.tellurian.com | 888-TELLURIAN | 973-300-9211
"Good will, like a good name, is got by many actions, and lost by one." -
Francis Jeffrey
More information about the NANOG
mailing list