i'd like to know your opinions on the com/net wildcard issue

Thu Oct 23 06:38:50 UTC 2003

Not to put too fine a point on it or undermine Paul's desire for people to take
the survey in order to see results, but, this isn't a small delta in perception,
either....  The overwhelming majority (more than almost 200 times as many)
people thought it was a BAD IDEA than a good one.  Decline-to-state and Web-
Browsing-End-User tied, and one more "Good idea" response was had from a
Domain-Name-Registrant for a total of 5 "Good idea" responses.

Zowie.... I think that's the most overwhelming amount of consensus I've _EVER_
seen in an internet poll/survey/vote/whatever.

Hey, Verisign lawyers, are you listening?

Owen

--On Wednesday, October 22, 2003 09:13:15 PM -0500 wayne <wayne at midwestcs.com> wrote:

>
> In <20031013145111.5667D13968 at sa.vix.com> Paul Vixie <paul at vix.com> writes:
>
>> see http://sa.vix.com/~vixie/comnetsurv/
>>
>> this is not an icann thing btw, it's just me.
>
> Welp, it has been over a week and the results seem to have pretty much
> stopped coming in.  It doesn't look like very many people think the
> wildcards were a good idea, although it scored the highest among
> "web-browsing end-users".
>
>
> Thanks for the survey Paul!
>
>
> -wayne
>

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20031022/176c8789/attachment.sig>