RoadRunner now bouncing the mail...

Mark Jeftovic markjr at easydns.com
Fri Oct 10 20:24:17 UTC 2003



It seems RoadRunner is no longer deferring us or refusing our
connections... they're BOUNCING everything.

Nice.

Oct 10 16:04:28 10.0.2.42 postfix/smtp[11683]: 778A77050E:
to=<________ at cfl.rr.com>, relay=flmx04.mgw.rr.com[65.32.1.50], delay=5,
status=bounced (host flmx04.mgw.rr.com[65.32.1.50] said: 550 5.7.1 Mail
Refused - 216.220.40 - See http://security.rr.com/mail_blocks.htm#security
- 20031009)

Oct 10 16:04:32 10.0.2.43 postfix/smtp[17668]: 5413470CC9:
to=<_________ at houston.rr.com>, relay=txmx02.mgw.rr.com[24.93.35.209],
delay=373, status=bounced (host txmx02.mgw.rr.com[24.93.35.209] said: 550
5.7.1 Mail Refused - 216.220.40 - See
http://security.rr.com/mail_blocks.htm#security - 20031009)

Oct 10 16:04:43 10.0.2.43 postfix/smtp[16008]: F3B5270BD5:
to=<_________ at carolina.rr.com>, relay=ncmx02.mgw.rr.com[24.25.4.96],
delay=437, status=bounced (host ncmx02.mgw.rr.com[24.25.4.96] said: 550
5.7.1 Mail Refused - 216.220.40 - See
http://security.rr.com/mail_blocks.htm#security - 20031009)

 On Fri, 10
Oct 2003, Gerald wrote:

>
> On Fri, 10 Oct 2003, Ray Wong wrote:
>
> > RR has been using a lot of blocks for quite some time.  Fortunately, they
> > were very responsive when I mailed their abuse address as indicated on that
> > URL.  I gave them the allocation I was responsible for, asked for that
> > subset of addresses to be unblocked, and things were fine within the day.
> > Was simple, if somewhat annoying.
>
> Actually we just got blocked this morning by RR. Is something going on
> there today?
>
> Gerald
>

-- 
Mark Jeftovic <markjr at easydns.com>
Co-founder, easyDNS Technologies Inc.
ph. +1-(416)-535-8672 ext 225
fx. +1-(416)-535-0237



More information about the NANOG mailing list