News coverage, Verisign etc.
John Neiberger
john.neiberger at efirstbank.com
Wed Oct 8 20:07:48 UTC 2003
>>>> "Steven M. Bellovin" <smb at research.att.com> 10/8/03 1:54:12 PM >>>
>>In these days of corporate malfeasance scandal coverage, you'd think
that
>>Verisign's tactics would have whetted the appetite of some bright
>>investigative reporter for one of the major publications.
>
>For all that I'm critical of wildcards in TLDs -- I spoke at the
>meeting yesterday, and my slides are on my Web page -- I don't think
>there are any issues of malfeasance. No one has been looting
>Verisign's coffers, they're not cooking the books, etc. I see three
>issues: is this technically wise, did Verisign have the right to do
>this under their current contract with ICANN, and should they have
such
>a right. I don't see anything resembling dishonesty.
The dishonesty came later in the form of press releases and
'commentary' by Mark McLaughlin. Well, perhaps dishonesty is too harsh a
term. Let's be kind and say they are being disingenuous instead.
John
--
More information about the NANOG
mailing list