VeriSign list (was: sitefinder ...)
Howard C. Berkowitz
hcb at gettcomm.com
Tue Oct 7 13:47:15 UTC 2003
At 9:27 AM -0400 10/7/03, William Allen Simpson wrote:
>Mark Kosters wrote:
>>
>> In the interest in gaining more community review and comment, a discussion
>> list has been setup to discuss factually-based technical issues
>> and solutions surrounding the operational impact of wildcards in
>> top-level domains on Internet applications.
>>
>We already have such mailing lists.
>
> 1) for technical "specification of message formats, message handling,
> and data formats used for DNS client-server and server-server
> communication": http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/
>
> A lively moderated discussion of wildcards is already underway.
>
> 2) for "[i]ssues surrounding the operation of DNS, recommendations
> concerning the configuration of DNS servers, and other issues with
> the use of the protocol": http://ops.ietf.org/lists/ops-area/
>
>
>> VeriSign technical people will participate in discussions that are within
>> the scope for this mailing list.
>>
>VeriSign technical people should have participated elsewhere, and this
>mess might have been less likely to occur.
>
>I will not participate in a VeriSign sponsored list, as that might
>give fodder for another "press release" claiming network operators and
>designers had reviewed and approved the VeriSign changes. I recommend
>that others only join neutral unaffiliated discussion lists.
Judging by my troubles in signing up for it -- and, sort of as a
matter of crochety pride, I am NOT going to go through a browser to
sign up for a mailing list (at least run by people who ought to know
better about email but seem to assume the World is the Web), the list
may become moot.
I thought I was on namedroppers, but I haven't seen a message in a
long time and will make a point of resubscribing.
More information about the NANOG
mailing list