CCO/cisco.com issues.

Tue Oct 7 00:45:46 UTC 2003

On Mon, 6 Oct 2003, ed at the7thbeer.com wrote:

> > > Anyone who doesn't think that's an operational issue, just wait until it
> > > bites you on the ass.
> >
> > Now we have clear evidence that there are no less than three who
> > understand the threat.
> 
> My first thought was that the DDoS was a means of obscuring access to
> patches for other vulnerabilities that might be simulatenously exploited.
> I'm assuming, though not certain, that Cisco would have alternative
> distribution/communication/update channels in such an event, but is that
> indeed the case?

My access to ftp.cisco.com is working fine whilst the website remains down..

Steve