Hijacked IP space.

Tue Nov 4 15:26:01 UTC 2003

Randy,
	Those options are not mutually exclusive, and, while I agree that
it would be better if the RIR's accepted generic GPG keys along the lines
of what RADB does, the X.509 certificate is not a bad first step.  At  least
it's better than Mail-From or Crypt-PW.

Owen


--On Tuesday, November 4, 2003 7:08 AM -0800 Randy Bush <randy at psg.com> 
wrote:

>
>>> Should we, as a community, register with RIR's with PGP.
>> Each of the RIRs has either already established, or is in the process of
>> establishing, a CA for that purpose.  Please use them.
>
> thanks, but i choose to have my peers certify my identity, not the
> rirs
>
> randy
>


-- 
If it wasn't signed, it probably didn't come from me.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 186 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20031104/bf542722/attachment.sig>