dnsbl's? - an informal survey

Sat May 31 02:18:10 UTC 2003

	Hello Jack ,

On Fri, 30 May 2003, Jack Bates wrote:
> Mr. James W. Laferriere wrote:
> > 	Hello Charles & All ,  Love all of you that want to filter ,
> > 	Please do I would bo one of those that you'd filter .  I've been
> > 	running my little home netowrk for ~8 years using dialup ,  isdn ,
> > 	adsl , cable .  Never could get any employer to fork over better
> > 	than that .  It brings to mind something Randy said ,(something
> > 	like) I highly recommend that my compititon ...
> > 	That way people (ie: customers who know better) will find a
> > 	non/inteligent-filering provider .  Please THINK before doing .
> > 		Hth ,  JimL
> You seem to think that customers give ISPs a choice. The fact is,
> customers scream about the 50-90% spam that hits their mailbox and want
> it gone at any cost. Whitelisting is easy, and done when requested.
> Customers are happy.
	White listing is NOT what was being discussed .  Tho is can be
	adventagous in the right circumstances .

> The stance now stands, if you can't afford a static IP address to
> properly run a mail server, then use a smart host. If a server isn't
> static, then the IP address can't be trusted or the next guy at that IP
> address will be a spammer. Most places will whitelist based on email
> address or vanity domain if asked.
	And neither was Static addressing .  Filtering was being discussed
	based on some unknown (to me probably others as well) methodology .
		Twyl ,  JimL
-- 
       +------------------------------------------------------------------+
       | James   W.   Laferriere | System    Techniques | Give me VMS     |
       | Network        Engineer |     P.O. Box 854     |  Give me Linux  |
       | babydr at baby-dragons.com | Coudersport PA 16915 |   only  on  AXP |
       +------------------------------------------------------------------+