dnsbl's? - an informal survey
Mr. James W. Laferriere
babydr at baby-dragons.com
Fri May 30 23:33:47 UTC 2003
Hello Charles & All , Love all of you that want to filter ,
Please do I would bo one of those that you'd filter . I've been
running my little home netowrk for ~8 years using dialup , isdn ,
adsl , cable . Never could get any employer to fork over better
than that . It brings to mind something Randy said ,(something
like) I highly recommend that my compititon ...
That way people (ie: customers who know better) will find a
non/inteligent-filering provider . Please THINK before doing .
Hth , JimL
On Fri, 30 May 2003, Charles Sprickman wrote:
> On Fri, 30 May 2003 listuser at numbnuts.net wrote:
> > Pretty much all the dialup lists contain dynamically assigned DSL/cable
> > IPs as well.
> > I don't have a problem with rejecting a 56k modem user with one of those
> > lists. Even I'm leary about rejecting mail from DSL/cable customers in
> > the same manner. Yes they shoud SmartHost to their provider. There are
> > lots of times when that isn't feasible.
> Dialup is a good throw-away, as is cable. DSL gets a bit more
> interesting, as you have "upscale" ADSL services, like Speakeasy, that
> give out static IPs and they tend to attract people who wish to run
> servers at home. Now a list that canned dialup, cable, and most dynamic
> IP DSL, that would be just peachy. But from where I sit, I'm still seeing
> lots of junk from other sources, usually overseas, and lately a good deal
> of domestic from co-lo providers that don't enforce their AUPs.
--
+------------------------------------------------------------------+
| James W. Laferriere | System Techniques | Give me VMS |
| Network Engineer | P.O. Box 854 | Give me Linux |
| babydr at baby-dragons.com | Coudersport PA 16915 | only on AXP |
+------------------------------------------------------------------+
More information about the NANOG
mailing list