[ifl.net #3657] Contact at: DNSRBL / Namesystems

Tue May 27 16:26:56 UTC 2003

mark

have you seen any 'probes' from dnsrbl.net in response to your 'remove' 
request. Most RBL's probe with their tests as a response. When the tests 
don't work (or do work depending on the logic!) they should take you off 
the RBL fairly shortly.

-- 
Martin Hepworth
Senior Systems Administrator
Solid State Logic Ltd
+44 (0)1865 842300

Mark Vevers wrote:
> Justin,
> 
> On Tuesday 27 May 2003 16:51, listuser at numbnuts.net wrote:
> 
>>I've checked all 3 MXs listed for vevers.net and none of them are listed
>>in any DNSBLs I can see, including dnsrbl.net.
> 
> I work for an ISP - we have a number of mail exchangers - my domain is not
> on the affected server .... and the particular server (194.238.48.13) is
> still listed.
> 
> 
>>I hate to ask the obvious but did you follow the instructions for removal
>>on this page?    http://www.dnsrbl.net/getremoved.html
> 
> Of course  ....  twice.  
> 
> Anyone on the list care to comment on the most effective way to get their
> mailservers taken off unresponsive RBL's? (other than not let them be on there 
> in the first place).  We think we know how this one happened but it would be
> nice to know so that we can be sure we've plugged the hole - we were never
> even informed that the server and had been listed in the first place - we
> found out the hard way. I do think that RBL's operators ought to at least
> respond to legitimate attempts to clear up issue.
> 
> Regards
> Mark

**********************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager.

This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.

www.mimesweeper.com
**********************************************************************