PMTU and Broken Servers
Curtis Maurand
curtis at maurand.com
Mon May 12 19:49:48 UTC 2003
I had a problem where a NXNetworks VPN router didn't process the results
properly. I couldn't put my finger on exactly whose router was causing
the trouble, but using freeswan to a freeswan I was able to test my theory
as I gradually increased the MTU on my connection until I got a failure.
One end of the VPN is on a RoadRunner connection and the other was on a
Prexar connection. The route in between is anyone's guess, but I think,
at the time, Prexar was trying to push traffic over their Cable and
Wireless connection. Now that C&W is gone, I'll have to try it again.
Curtis
On Mon, 12 May 2003, Stephen J. Wilcox wrote:
>
> You mean theres routers which get a large packet and silently drop it rather
> than return an icmp?
>
> Curious as to know which vendors? (read fundementally broken!)
>
> Steve
>
> On Mon, 12 May 2003, Curtis Maurand wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > I've had the problem before. Not all routers handle PMTU correctly.
> >
> > Curtis
> >
> > On Thu, 8 May 2003, Leo Bicknell wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > I've recently had the pleasure of troubleshooting a problem I don't
> > > normally have to deal with, and the results don't quite make sense
> > > to me. I'm hoping someone can enlighten me as to what is going on.
> > > A diagram:
> > >
> > > server---internet---fw---tunnelbox1----tunnelbox2----user
> > >
> > > The tunnel between the tunnelboxes is a lower (1480) MTU. Originally
> > > the user couldn't access some servers, turns out the firewall was
> > > filtering ICMP Can't Fragment messages, preventing PMTU from working
> > > in the server->user direction (tunnelbox1 would generate Can't
> > > Fragement, firewall would filter).
> > >
> > > That's been corrected. Going to a server I control I see good PMTU
> > > in both directions between the server and the user. However, there
> > > are still a number of web servers for popular sites that behave
> > > just like the firewall was still filtering Can't Fragments. The
> > > theory is that the servers are behind a firewall/load balancer that
> > > is filtering them on the server side -- but I find it slightly
> > > (emphasis on the slightly) that someone would turn on PMTU discovery,
> > > and then filter it out right in front of the boxes where they turned
> > > it on. Also, it seems to me most DSL users are behind PPPoE links
> > > with lower MTU, and should get hit by the same problem.
> > >
> > > The temporary hack is to have tunnelbox1 clear the DF bit on all
> > > incoming packets, which just causes the packets to get fragmented
> > > going down the tunnel. A minor performance hit, but it works.
> > >
> > > This is a new problem to me, but I'm sure people have run into it
> > > before. Are the servers really that broken (PMTU enabled, ICMP
> > > Can't Fragement filtered)? Does the head end box of DSL services
> > > generally do something to work around this (ie, clear the DF bit)?
> > > Am I just being an idiot and missing something obvious?
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
--
--
Curtis Maurand
mailto:curtis at maurand.com
http://www.maurand.com
More information about the NANOG
mailing list