How to prove 22.214.171.124/24 is authorized?
Richard A Steenbergen
ras at e-gerbil.net
Fri May 2 15:05:03 UTC 2003
On Thu, May 01, 2003 at 11:36:55PM -0700, brett watson wrote:
> On Thursday, May 1, 2003, at 23:27 America/Phoenix, Sean Donelan wrote:
> >Back to the original question Chris Morrow asked a long time ago. What
> >should be considered acceptable proof?
> >If Paul Vixie showed up on my doorstep tomorrow, and asked me to route
> >126.96.36.199; what proof should I accept from him (or anyone) to
> >beyond a reasonable doubt he has the authority to route a particular
> oh! i know! because i know paul, and will personally vouch for him?
To which the response is usually something like:
"Then you are obviously a co-conspirator, and we will now begin
investigating your involvement. Please provide all of your information and
justify everything you are doing, before we post everything we can find on
you to a mailing list or newsgroup."
Richard A Steenbergen <ras at e-gerbil.net> http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)
More information about the NANOG