How to prove 188.8.131.52/24 is authorized?
brett at the-watsons.org
Fri May 2 06:36:55 UTC 2003
On Thursday, May 1, 2003, at 23:27 America/Phoenix, Sean Donelan wrote:
> Back to the original question Chris Morrow asked a long time ago. What
> should be considered acceptable proof?
> If Paul Vixie showed up on my doorstep tomorrow, and asked me to route
> 184.108.40.206; what proof should I accept from him (or anyone) to
> beyond a reasonable doubt he has the authority to route a particular
oh! i know! because i know paul, and will personally vouch for him?
More information about the NANOG