FW: About your using mailer
Kris Foster
Kris.Foster at telus.com
Fri Mar 28 17:51:00 UTC 2003
> Is anyone else getting this junk regarding the list? And can
> we put a stop
> to it?
Got the same message. I think Miyoko's fight should be with the vendors,
not the poor people who are subjected to the whims of an IS department.
Kris
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Miyoko Shioda [mailto:wjxv4y at k3.dion.ne.jp]
> Sent: Friday, March 28, 2003 9:30 AM
> To: Mike Damm
> Subject: Re: About your using mailer
>
>
> dear Mike Damm,
>
> Sorry, I am talking about NANOG mailing list.
> Please please change your MUA in mainling list...
>
> Regards,
>
> On Fri, 28 Mar 2003 09:28:17 -0800
> Mike Damm <MikeD at irwinresearch.com> wrote:
>
> > What mailing list are you talking about?
> >
> > ---
> > Michael Damm, MIS Department, Irwin Research & Development
> > V: 509.457.5080 x298 F: 509.577.0301 E: miked at irwinresearch.com
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Miyoko Shioda [mailto:wjxv4y at k3.dion.ne.jp]
> > Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 5:16 PM
> > To: MikeD at irwinresearch.com
> > Subject: About your using mailer
> >
> >
> > Hi,
> > I read your messages in mailing list.
> >
> > Your using mailer(MUA) does not seems to support In-Reply-To nor
> References
> > field. These field is defined in RFC-2822.
> > If these field does not be outputted when you reply, tree
> construction
> > will be break every time you post the messages to mailing list.
> > It is inconvenient for the others.
> >
> > Please please change your mailer for the public good,
> > at least when you post to mailing list.
> >
> > Today almost mailers support these field(at least In-Reply-To)
> > except for the following mailers.
> >
> > MSN hotmail
> > Exchange Server <= 2000 (Exchange Server 2003 will support
> In-Reply-To.)
> > Lotus Notes < 6.0
> > MIME-Tools
> > AOL mailer
> > dtmail
> > Novell GroupWise
> > foxmail
> >
> > regards,
> >
> > --
> > Miyoko Shioda
> > wjxv4y at k3.dion.ne.jp
> >
>
> --
> Miyoko Shioda <wjxv4y at k3.dion.ne.jp>
>
>
>
More information about the NANOG
mailing list