is this true or... ?

Fri Mar 28 15:35:09 UTC 2003

Steven M. Bellovin wrote:
> but there may be session state -- it's bill HB 2121) only criminalizes the
> conduct if it's done "with intent to harm or defraud a communications
> service provider".  Now, given the anti-NAT and anti-VPN tendencies of some
> broadband ISPs, I'm not necessarily thrilled, but it's not quite the 
> same as was originally suggested.  
> 

Without looking it up (a little busy), there should be a Definitions 
section defining communications service provider. Is the bill aimed at 
ISP's or is it aimed at the actual Telco?

-Jack
*probably just creating noise*