69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering..

Mon Mar 10 22:28:55 UTC 2003

On Mon, 10 Mar 2003, Todd A. Blank wrote:
> I continue to agree that moving critical resources (see below) to these
> new blocks is the best approach I have seen or heard in the months since
> I made the original post.  This approach punishes the clueless instead
> of the people that already know what the problem is (and have to live
> with it every day)

After this 69.0.0.0/8 thing is sorted out I guess we can move the
"critical resources" over to 202.0.0.0/7 to track down all the idiots
blocking that range (trying to decide if I should put a smilie here).

I nominate the arin.net nameservers.

Could someone publish a name of a valid resource (or even pingable ip) in
69/8 space? This would allow people to test their (and their upsteams)
filters quickly while we wait for the list to come out.

-- 
Simon Lyall.                |  Newsmaster  | Work: simon.lyall at ihug.co.nz
Senior Network/System Admin |  Postmaster  | Home: simon at darkmere.gen.nz
Ihug Ltd, Auckland, NZ      | Asst Doorman | Web: http://www.darkmere.gen.nz