69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering..

jlewis at lewis.org jlewis at lewis.org
Mon Mar 10 17:52:06 UTC 2003


On Mon, 10 Mar 2003, E.B. Dreger wrote:

> Now, how can we force that?  Sufficient reward for doing so, or
> pain for failure.  Evidently "some people can't reach you" isn't
> enough pain, and having full reachability isn't enough reward.

I think the only way that's relatively guaranteed to be effective is to 
move a critical resource (like the gtld-servers) into new IP blocks when 
previously reserved blocks are assigned to RIR's.

I still have a couple hundred thousand IPs to check (I'm going to step up
the pace and see if I can get through the list today), but I already have
a list of several hundred IPs in networks that ignore 69/8.  The list
includes such networks as NASA, the US DoD, and networks in China, Russia,
and Poland.  Those are just a few that I've done manual whois's for.

I haven't decided yet whether I'll send automated messages to all the 
broken networks and give them time to respond and fix their filters, or 
just post them all to NANOG when the list is complete.

Are people interested in seeing the full list (at least the ones I find)
of networks that filter 69/8?

Does Atlantic.Net get an ARIN discount for doing all this leg work? :)
 
----------------------------------------------------------------------
 Jon Lewis *jlewis at lewis.org*|  I route
 System Administrator        |  therefore you are
 Atlantic Net                |  
_________ http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key_________




More information about the NANOG mailing list