69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering..

Christopher L. Morrow chris at UU.NET
Mon Mar 10 17:50:29 UTC 2003



On Mon, 10 Mar 2003, E.B. Dreger wrote:

>
> CLM> Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2003 17:30:27 +0000 (GMT)
> CLM> From: Christopher L. Morrow
>
>
> CLM> This can be VERY dangerous, the default part atleast. At one
> CLM> point we, as an experiment in stupidity (it turns out)
> CLM> announced 0/1 (almost default).  We quickly recieved well
> CLM> over 600kpps to that announcement. This in a very steady
>
> Announced via IGP or BGP?  I hope/assume the former, but am
> somewhat surprised at the traffic volume... even for UUNet.

bgp, no-export.

>
>
> Eddy
> --
> Brotsman & Dreger, Inc. - EverQuick Internet Division
> Bandwidth, consulting, e-commerce, hosting, and network building
> Phone: +1 (785) 865-5885 Lawrence and [inter]national
> Phone: +1 (316) 794-8922 Wichita
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 11:23:58 +0000 (GMT)
> From: A Trap <blacklist at brics.com>
> To: blacklist at brics.com
> Subject: Please ignore this portion of my mail signature.
>
> These last few lines are a trap for address-harvesting spambots.
> Do NOT send mail to <blacklist at brics.com>, or you are likely to
> be blocked.
>




More information about the NANOG mailing list