69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering..

Haesu haesu at towardex.com
Mon Mar 10 16:18:29 UTC 2003


Perhaps I should have been more clear on what I was saying.. Sorry about
that..

What I really meant by single pt. of failure was... problems of losing the
filtering list if the central system is down... Granted, this would not
cause any network issues..

-hc

On Mon, 10 Mar 2003, Mark Segal wrote:

>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Haesu [mailto:haesu at towardex.com]
> >
> > I totally agree with you. However, as always, centralized
> > systems, while ease management and scalability, everything
> > becomes a trust issue and a single point of failure or source
> > of problems...
> Single point of failure? Not sure I agree with you.. What happens if your
> sink hole disapears? Your filtering goes out.. O no.. Please not that.
> Hardley think that is even a reason for a noc to page you... :).
>
> Regards,
> Mark
>
> --
> Mark Segal
> Director, Data Services
> Futureway Communications Inc.
> Tel: (905)326-1570
>




More information about the NANOG mailing list