Question concerning authoritative bodies.

Sun Mar 9 22:45:19 UTC 2003

> Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2003 14:59:05 -0500 (EST)
> From: jlewis

> In AOL's case, they couldn't even tell us why our mail was
> being rejected or our connections to their MX's blocked and I
> had to wait a week for their postmaster dept. to get to my
> ticket and return my call to fill me in on what was going on.

Ewwww.  Much better to put a semi-descriptive code in the 5.x.x
and give a contact phone number and/or off-net email box.

> Parts of the community have already decided and have helped to
> create central quasi-authoratative DNSBLs.  If nobody uses a
> DNSBL, who care's what's in it?  If a sufficient number of

True.  It cracks me up when someone complains about being on
Selwerd XBL.

Eddy
--
Brotsman & Dreger, Inc. - EverQuick Internet Division
Bandwidth, consulting, e-commerce, hosting, and network building
Phone: +1 (785) 865-5885 Lawrence and [inter]national
Phone: +1 (316) 794-8922 Wichita

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 11:23:58 +0000 (GMT)
From: A Trap <blacklist at brics.com>
To: blacklist at brics.com
Subject: Please ignore this portion of my mail signature.

These last few lines are a trap for address-harvesting spambots.
Do NOT send mail to <blacklist at brics.com>, or you are likely to
be blocked.