spamcop.net?

Tue Mar 4 04:43:56 UTC 2003

Not for nothing, but there's so much time wasted with all these diversified
spam systems.

I've been reading about Barry Shein's proposals and I have to say I am on board
with a centralized -single- system based on his young, but intelligent, model.

http://www.internetweek.com/breakingNews/INW20021219S0003

I applaud RBL, spamcop, etc., but without funding and consolidation, it's 
another
waste of offensive time that could be spent on a far more effective defense.

-M

At 02:51 AM 3/4/2003 +0000, Christopher L. Morrow wrote:

>On Mon, 3 Mar 2003, blitz wrote:
>
> >
> > Anyone having trouble getting to/ know of any issues with spamcop.net 
> today?
> >
> > They seemed to have dropped off the radar from me...
> >
> > No pings
> > No traceroute
> >
> > but they still show registered at 216.127.43.89
> >
>
>laptop ~]$ t 216.127.43.89 80
>Trying 216.127.43.89...
>Connected to 216.127.43.89 (216.127.43.89).
>Escape character is '^]'.
>GET /
>
>hmm, there isnt anything returning right now, but it connects atleast :)
>
> > Tnx
> >
> > Marc
> > macronet.net
> >

Regards,

--
Martin Hannigan                    hannigan at fugawi.net