anti-spam vs network abuse
Charlie Clemmer
cclemmer at nexgennetworks.com
Sat Mar 1 19:32:38 UTC 2003
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
At 01:41 PM 3/1/2003 -0500, Michael Lamoureux wrote:
> andy> In this case, your door being unlocked cannot cause me
>andy> harm. However, an "unlocked proxy" can.
>
>Heh, so I guess you could make it his gun and the safety. Does that
>change your answer? ;-)
Heh ... I wasn't going to go there, but that's what I meant by being
prepared for my response. :)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.0
iQA/AwUBPmEK3qvEtUU05riwEQJ0CQCgsGRx8acSws4V4nQ6wJuodBtewukAoPOd
fYTiwDfn9DEn7yUGIW5esq4/
=m4Xq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the NANOG
mailing list