anti-spam vs network abuse

Charlie Clemmer cclemmer at nexgennetworks.com
Sat Mar 1 19:32:38 UTC 2003



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

At 01:41 PM 3/1/2003 -0500, Michael Lamoureux wrote:
>  andy> In this case, your door being unlocked cannot cause me
>andy> harm. However, an "unlocked proxy" can.
>
>Heh, so I guess you could make it his gun and the safety.  Does that
>change your answer?  ;-)

Heh ... I wasn't going to go there, but that's what I meant by being 
prepared for my response. :) 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.0

iQA/AwUBPmEK3qvEtUU05riwEQJ0CQCgsGRx8acSws4V4nQ6wJuodBtewukAoPOd
fYTiwDfn9DEn7yUGIW5esq4/
=m4Xq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----





More information about the NANOG mailing list