more on lame-delegation.org, seems to waste IP space and DNS
Joe Abley
jabley at isc.org
Wed Jun 18 00:50:21 UTC 2003
On Tuesday, Jun 17, 2003, at 12:18 Canada/Eastern, John Brown wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 05:03:07AM -0700, william at elan.net wrote:
>>
>> For all top-level domains you can register a domain and not have any
>> name servers specified for it. In whois it'll say exactly that -
>> "no nameservers".
>
> Not correct, registrar and registry agreements require at least two
> name servers.
Any registry that supports RRP (Verisign Registry, PIR) or even
slightly old drafts of EPP must allow domains to be registered with no
host objects, since there is no other way to allow domains with
subordinate nameservers to be created in the registry (the required
procedure is create-domain-with-no-nameservers,
create-subordinate-hosts, add-nameservers-to-domain). Domains with no
nameservers can't appear in the corresponding registry zone, since no
delegation is possible.
Note this is registry functionality made available to registrars, and
does not necessarily imply functionality available to registrants.
Joe
More information about the NANOG
mailing list