more on lame-delegation.org, seems to waste IP space and DNS

bmanning at karoshi.com bmanning at karoshi.com
Tue Jun 17 15:36:57 UTC 2003




	quoted-printable returned as a favor to all
	those who can't live w/o it.

	such zone exist and process were(are?) in place
	to create delegations like this.

> 
> 
> 
> --pf9I7BMVVzbSWLtt
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Disposition: inline
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> 
> In a message written on Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 07:05:17PM -0700, william at elan=
> .net wrote:
> > If what they are doing is not ok, what would you propose?
> 
> This is a bit of a sideways step, but...
> 
> I'm sure a lot of people would like to be able to register a zone
> and not point it at any nameservers, and not even have it appear
> in the top level zone files.  Many people "sit" on a zone for many
> reasons, and in most cases having to point them at a nameserver
> just to register it is pointless and stupid.
> 
> If a domain could exist in that state, then these domains could
> just have the lame name servers removed from their records, possibly
> existing with no nameservers, until the owner pointed them at the
> right place.
> 
> --=20
>        Leo Bicknell - bicknell at ufp.org - CCIE 3440
>         PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/
> Read TMBG List - tmbg-list-request at tmbg.org, www.tmbg.org
> 
> --pf9I7BMVVzbSWLtt
> Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
> Content-Disposition: inline
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD)
> 
> iD8DBQE+7yZxNh6mMG5yMTYRAmBFAJ9rsJjvhOM/3JEv5SuTec2jw9cotACfUlhy
> qU4SOQhoVDb32ZK2XTXOh4A=
> =eVZj
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> 
> --pf9I7BMVVzbSWLtt--
> 




More information about the NANOG mailing list