Mobile code security (was Re: rr style scanning of non-customers)

Brandon Butterworth brandon at rd.bbc.co.uk
Mon Jun 16 14:43:41 UTC 2003


> the thing that actually burns my hash, is when my spam
> complaints or noc correspondance are robotically bounced because they
> contain dangerous mime attachments of type "message/rfc822" (spam
> examples) or "text/plain" (traceroute or tcpdump output). if your noc
> or abusedesk has such a robot protecting it, you ought to be ashamed.

Or they may be happy thinking their NOC is more 0day virus proof rather
than hoping a 3rd party will update their scanner in time

Who'd want to risk the NOC falling to the same problem that's just
taken out the network they're trying to fix?

brandon




More information about the NANOG mailing list