FW: Minimum prefix length?
Mike
mike at rockynet.com
Wed Jun 11 21:14:49 UTC 2003
Stephen J. Wilcox wrote:
> Howevers its curious that signatures such as this claiming to be confidential
> are posted to a list which is very much public and archived in several public
> websites.. not sure how right it is to autoappend them to all your mails as well
> as the private ones!
There is a current belief (IANAL) that once you publicly post messages
with such a disclaimer, the disclaimer will be unenforceable in court
thereafter.
I.E. John Doe posts something to public mailing list with the usual
legalese disclaimer. I read John's posts, and realize that his
disclaimer has no meaning- he has intended for the general public to see
his communication and has authorized everyone explicitly. How can John
later claim, if I inadvertantly received a misdirected private
communication, that I was not authorized, since he has previously given
blanket authorization to the public at large to read (some) communications?
This might seem like splitting hairs, but I bet a good lawyer can make a
whole case out of it.
More information about the NANOG
mailing list