North America not interested in IP V6

Wed Jul 30 13:07:18 UTC 2003

Hi Marcel,
 I tried 12.2(?)T last year and had problems, I put that down to problems in the 
12.2T IOS tho not specific to v6.

I'm currently running 12.2S on ao couple routers, ipv6 is not enabled yet but 
the IOS's have behaved well so far... the next step is to check it with ipv6 on

Steve

On Wed, 30 Jul 2003, Marcel Lemmen wrote:

> 
> 
> Well, now we are talking about IPv6, I can ask a question right here ;)
> 
> Does anyone have any experiences with the Cisco IPv6 IOS (T or S
> releases)? Can be either good or bad experiences. I heard there were some
> issues (router freezes etc) with the T releases...
> 
> Have to convince the management :)
> 
> With kind regards,
> 
> Marcel Lemmen
> Support Net - Partner in Managed Internet Solutions
> 
> --= Try http://alt.binaries.nl =--
> 
> --- The previous message was something like this: ---
> 
> !>Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2003 13:12:38 +0200
> !>From: Alexander Koch <koch at tiscali.net>
> !>To: Neil J. McRae <neil at DOMINO.ORG>
> !>Cc: "Nipper, Arnold" <arnold at nipper.de>,
> !>     Peter Galbavy <peter.galbavy at knowtion.net>, Roy <garlic at garlic.com>,
> !>     nanog at merit.edu
> !>Subject: Re: North America not interested in IP V6
> !>
> !>
> !>Neil, all,
> !>
> !>On Wed, 30 July 2003 11:58:34 +0100, Neil J. McRae wrote:
> !>> > Here at DE-CIX (www.de-cix.net) I can see that more and more ISP are joining
> !>> > the IPv6 trial (http://www.de-cix.net/info/decix-ipv6/) . Currently already
> !>> > 20% of all ~120 ISP at DE-CIX have IPv6 enabled.
> !>>
> !>> I'd be more interested in seeing how many customer connections
> !>> are using IPV6.
> !>
> !>in fact we (Tiscali) have three customers in Europe that
> !>have their own /32 and are running v6 in parallel to v4, and
> !>we do transit for them. I do not like that 'full table
> !>everywhere' thing at all which is stil way too common in
> !>Europe, it does not help pushing v6.
> !>
> !>Regards,
> !>Alexander
> !>
> !>(AS-TISCALI-V6PEERS for whom it may concern)
> !>
> 