rfc1918 ignorant
Dave Temkin
dave at ordinaryworld.com
Wed Jul 23 12:59:18 UTC 2003
Is this really an issue? So long as they're not advertising the space I
see no issue with routing traffic through a 10. network as transit. If
you have no reason to reach their router directly (and after Cisco's last
exploit, I'd think no one would want anyone to reach their router directly
:-) ), what's the harm done?
RFC1918 merely states that it shouldn't be routed on the global internet,
not that it can't be used for transit space.
<--------------------------->
Is there a site to "report" networks/isps that still leak rfc1918 space?
By leaking I not only mean "don't filter", but actually _use_ in their
network?
If someone is keeping a list, feel free to add ServerBeach.com. All
traceroutes to servers housed there, pass by 10.10.10.3.
traceroute to www.serverbeach.com
...
20. 64-132-228-70.gen.twtelecom.net
21. 10.10.10.3
22. 66.139.72.12
Kind Regards,
Frank Louwers
--
Openminds bvba www.openminds.be
Tweebruggenstraat 16 - 9000 Gent - Belgium
--
David Temkin
More information about the NANOG
mailing list