anti-spam vs network abuse

Charlie Clemmer cclemmer at nexgennetworks.com
Fri Feb 28 22:15:03 UTC 2003



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

At 04:54 PM 2/28/2003 -0500, Andy Dills wrote:
>You don't have to. This is why I never understood why people care so much
>about probing. If you do a good job with your network, probing will have
>zero affect on you. All the person probing can do (regardless of their
>intent) is say "Gee, I guess there aren't any vulnerabilities with this
>network."

I don't have to understand why you're probing my network? (using the term 
"your" loosely, not referring specifically to Andy's network/hosts) The 
actual probe may not have any affect on my network, but if you probe my 
network/hosts because someone iusing the same colo facilities as me sent 
you mail (not through me), there is no way for me to determine whether your 
intent is hostile or not, and you will likely set off my IDS alerts. 
There's two reasons to probe my hosts ... trying to protect your hosts or 
trying to violate mine, and if I've not initiated any type of communication 
to your host(s), I can only assume your intent is hostile since it was 
unprovoked.  
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.0

iQA/AwUBPl/fbavEtUU05riwEQKRLgCg2b7p6ua04d1tOIBtAWYe034+tOAAoKER
aiwfIt8uR557NG21FddezLQ8
=7hDv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----





More information about the NANOG mailing list