AOL rejecting mail from IP's w/o reverse DNS ?
just me
matt at snark.net
Thu Dec 4 23:02:43 UTC 2003
On Fri, 5 Dec 2003, Petri Helenius wrote:
And I refer you to the blocks which are properly registered down
to the /29 level and you are saying that if you are a good citizen
collateral damage is recommended regardless because antispammers
are either lazy or technically incompetent or like their ego
boosted by intentional collateral damage?
Pete
Can you explain to the less hyperbolic among us, why I should be
obligated to exchange packets with a provider who hosts abusive
customers.
--mghali at snark.net------------------------------------------<darwin><
Flowers on the razor wire/I know you're here/We are few/And far
between/I was thinking about her skin/Love is a many splintered
thing/Don't be afraid now/Just walk on in. #include <disclaim.h>
More information about the NANOG
mailing list