incorrect spam setups cause spool messes on forwarders
Suresh Ramasubramanian
suresh at outblaze.com
Tue Dec 2 19:34:35 UTC 2003
Alexander Bochmann writes on 12/2/2003 2:05 PM:
> If some of the large Email providers like Outblaze,
> Hotmail, Yahoo, AOL, etc. could agree on a more
> integrated approach to implement at least some form
> of sender authorization - possibly in the line of the
> RMX RR draft[1] - as a service to the public, the
> aggressive MX callbacks would perhaps be made
> redundant...
There are just too many RMX proposals around.
Once some of them get consolidated, it will be a good idea to adopt the
best and most popularly accepted one.
At least now that ASRG has some good new leadership with John Levine
stepping in as co-chair (Yakov has always been doing a great job) I hope
things move forward :)
By the way there will be a panel on the different proposals during the
conference track on spam that we at apcauce.org are organizing at
APRICOT 2004 (www.apricot2004.net). Speakers include Dave Crocker and
Meng Weng Wong (the originator of spf)
srs
--
srs (postmaster|suresh)@outblaze.com // gpg : EDEDEFB9
manager, outblaze.com security and antispam operations
More information about the NANOG
mailing list