arnold at nipper.de
Sun Dec 21 00:37:03 UTC 2003
Stephen J. Wilcox wrote, On 21.12.2003 01:23:
>>I don't believe that route servers in the RFC 1863 sense have ever seen
>>any real deployment.
> I know at least one big global backbone who uses that deployment... i also know
> it causes them headaches!
To work properly rfc1863 requires also modified clients. Would be
interestung to know what this big global backbone is using.
We considered to implement rfc1863 in quagga (www.quagga.net) but
stopped when we saw that clients have to support rfc1863 as well. And
afaik no one of the big vendors does (or is even considering)
More information about the NANOG