AOL rejecting mail from IP's w/o reverse DNS ?

just me matt at snark.net
Sun Dec 7 23:26:31 UTC 2003


On Mon, 8 Dec 2003, Petri Helenius wrote:
  just me wrote:

  >Can you explain to the less hyperbolic among us, why I should be
  >obligated to exchange packets with a provider who hosts abusive
  >customers.

  You, and nobody else is not. The difference is if you carpet-bomb
  the provider or launch a smart device to it´s intended target.

  I´ll leave the rest of the obvious analogies as an excersize to the reader.

  Pete

Right. Just because a provider condones one of its customer's abusive
and irrisponsible behavior, doesn't mean it would be OK for the rest
of the provider's customers.

You don't get it. And probably never will. Enjoy your future of
Nigerian herbal viagra colonic spam.

matto


--mghali at snark.net------------------------------------------<darwin><
   Flowers on the razor wire/I know you're here/We are few/And far
   between/I was thinking about her skin/Love is a many splintered
   thing/Don't be afraid now/Just walk on in. #include <disclaim.h>




More information about the NANOG mailing list