AOL rejecting mail from IP's w/o reverse DNS ?
alh-ietf at tndh.net
Fri Dec 5 00:26:39 UTC 2003
just me wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Dec 2003, Petri Helenius wrote:
> And I refer you to the blocks which are properly registered down
> to the /29 level and you are saying that if you are a good citizen
> collateral damage is recommended regardless because antispammers
> are either lazy or technically incompetent or like their ego
> boosted by intentional collateral damage?
> Can you explain to the less hyperbolic among us, why I should be
> obligated to exchange packets with a provider who hosts abusive
Disclaimer: I am not a lawyer.
That said, IMHO you are free to do what you want as an individual, but
collusion by a group to block a provider (even one with abusive customers)
smells a lot like restraint of trade.
More information about the NANOG