AOL rejecting mail from IP's w/o reverse DNS ?
crist.clark at globalstar.com
Thu Dec 4 22:04:54 UTC 2003
Adam McKenna wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 09:53:37AM -0800, Adam McKenna wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 09:48:44AM -0800, Randy Bush wrote:
> > > > How can delegating in-addr.arpa on a per-ip basis be any different or worse
> > > > than delegating it using an rfc2317 scheme?
> > >
> > > consider the label of the ns rr to delegate only 220.127.116.11
> > Do you mean ns.18.104.22.168.in-addr.arpa? I still don't see what's wrong with
> > the following, or how it leads to cache poisoning or leaky name space.
> > 22.214.171.124.in-addr.arpa IN NS ns.126.96.36.199.in-addr.arpa.
> > ns.188.8.131.52.in-addr.arpa IN A 184.108.40.206
> Eight hours later, and I'm still waiting for a reply on this. Were the
> original attacks by Pete Ehlke warranted, or would he care to retract his
$ dig 3.2.1.in-addr.arpa soa
$ dig 220.127.116.11.in-addr.arpa soa
Crist J. Clark crist.clark at globalstar.com
Globalstar Communications (408) 933-4387
The information contained in this e-mail message is confidential,
intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above.
If the reader of this e-mail is not the intended recipient, or the
employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient,
you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this e-mail in error, please contact postmaster at globalstar.com
More information about the NANOG