And your solution is? (was RE: AOL rejecting mail from IP's w/o reverse DNS ?)

Sean Donelan sean at
Thu Dec 4 18:52:55 UTC 2003

On Thu, 4 Dec 2003, Tony Hain wrote:
> This is a broken model. People that are buying high level services should
> expect those to be delivered correctly, but those who are buying bit
> transport should not be required to obtain additional services to become
> fully functional. It is nice to fantasize that the ISP is in control, but
> time has shown that people will do what it takes to make their service work.
> If that means pushing the service provider into further irrelevance, they
> will. Rather than trying to break service for the antonymous network by
> requiring consent from the cabal, the service providers need to be making it
> easier and cheaper to get the desired results from their service.

I'm sorry, I couldn't find your proposal for solving the problem in that
paragraph.  Could you tell us what your solution is.


More information about the NANOG mailing list