AOL rejecting mail from IP's w/o reverse DNS ?
adam at flounder.net
Thu Dec 4 01:34:00 UTC 2003
On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 09:53:37AM -0800, Adam McKenna wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 09:48:44AM -0800, Randy Bush wrote:
> > > How can delegating in-addr.arpa on a per-ip basis be any different or worse
> > > than delegating it using an rfc2317 scheme?
> > consider the label of the ns rr to delegate only 126.96.36.199
> Do you mean ns.188.8.131.52.in-addr.arpa? I still don't see what's wrong with
> the following, or how it leads to cache poisoning or leaky name space.
> 184.108.40.206.in-addr.arpa IN NS ns.220.127.116.11.in-addr.arpa.
> ns.18.104.22.168.in-addr.arpa IN A 22.214.171.124
Eight hours later, and I'm still waiting for a reply on this. Were the
original attacks by Pete Ehlke warranted, or would he care to retract his
More information about the NANOG