AOL rejecting mail from IP's w/o reverse DNS ?
adam at flounder.net
Wed Dec 3 17:53:37 UTC 2003
On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 09:48:44AM -0800, Randy Bush wrote:
> > How can delegating in-addr.arpa on a per-ip basis be any different or worse
> > than delegating it using an rfc2317 scheme?
> consider the label of the ns rr to delegate only 126.96.36.199
Do you mean ns.188.8.131.52.in-addr.arpa? I still don't see what's wrong with
the following, or how it leads to cache poisoning or leaky name space.
184.108.40.206.in-addr.arpa IN NS ns.220.127.116.11.in-addr.arpa.
ns.18.104.22.168.in-addr.arpa IN A 22.214.171.124
More information about the NANOG