relays.osirusoft.com
michael
michael at aplatform.com
Tue Aug 26 22:58:22 UTC 2003
Hello
; <<>> DiG 9.2.0 <<>> relays.osirusoft.com txt
;; global options: printcmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 39308
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 4, ADDITIONAL: 0
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;relays.osirusoft.com. IN TXT
;; ANSWER SECTION: relays.osirusoft.com. 86384 IN TXT "Please stop using
relays.osirusoft.com"
;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
osirusoft.com. 86384 IN NS ns2.osirusoft.com.
osirusoft.com. 86384 IN NS ns3.osirusoft.com.
osirusoft.com. 86384 IN NS ns4.osirusoft.com.
osirusoft.com. 86384 IN NS ns1.osirusoft.com.
On Tue, 26 Aug 2003, Crist Clark wrote:
> Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2003 15:55:10 -0700
> From: Crist Clark <crist.clark at globalstar.com>
> To: Gary E. Miller <gem at rellim.com>
> Cc: Richard Welty <rwelty at averillpark.net>, nanog at merit.edu
> Subject: Re: relays.osirusoft.com
>
>
> "Gary E. Miller" wrote:
> >
> > Yo Richard!
> >
> > returning 127.0.0.2 for everything would be an ugly way to bow out.
> >
> > I am just seeing timeouts for XXX.relays.osirusoft.com now.
>
> I'm seeing timeout issues too, which would match with DoS attacks. But
> in my logs I see,
>
> Aug 26 01:17:51 aurora named[284]: [ID 866145 daemon.info] lame server resolving '130.38.76.211.relays.osirusoft.com' (in 'relays.osirusoft.COM'?): 127.0.0.1#53
>
> (That's PDT), and in my cache I see,
>
> $ dig relays.osirusoft.com ns
>
> ; <<>> DiG 9.2.2 <<>> relays.osirusoft.com ns
> ;; global options: printcmd
> ;; Got answer:
> ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 59238
> ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 2, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1
>
> ;; QUESTION SECTION:
> ;relays.osirusoft.com. IN NS
>
> ;; ANSWER SECTION:
> relays.osirusoft.com. 33863 IN NS ns2-relays.osirusoft.com.
> relays.osirusoft.com. 33863 IN NS ns1-relays.osirusoft.com.
>
> ;; ADDITIONAL SECTION:
> ns1-relays.osirusoft.com. 33863 IN A 127.0.0.1
>
> ;; Query time: 7 msec
> ;; SERVER: 127.0.0.1#53(127.0.0.1)
> ;; WHEN: Tue Aug 26 15:49:15 2003
> ;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 104
>
>
More information about the NANOG
mailing list