To send or not to send 'virus in email' notifications?
Leo Bicknell
bicknell at ufp.org
Wed Aug 20 16:46:44 UTC 2003
In a message written on Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 11:40:53AM -0400, D'Arcy J.M. Cain wrote:
> Absolutely not. My spam filters are handling the original spam fine but I am
> getting tons of responses to email I didn't send in the first place. It's
> legitimate email from legitimate sources so the filters don't catch it but it
> is garbage nonetheless.
For those that use spamassassin, in ~/.spamassassin/user_prefs:
header VIRUS_BOUNCE X-MailScanner =~ /Found to be clean/
describe VIRUS_BOUNCE Has X-MailScanner with virus signature.
score VIRUS_BOUNCE 5.0
--
Leo Bicknell - bicknell at ufp.org - CCIE 3440
PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/
Read TMBG List - tmbg-list-request at tmbg.org, www.tmbg.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20030820/3c9be19f/attachment.sig>
More information about the NANOG
mailing list