Port blocking last resort in fight against virus
John Kristoff
jtk at depaul.edu
Wed Aug 13 20:52:28 UTC 2003
On Wed, 13 Aug 2003 09:10:32 +0200
Robert Raszuk <raszuk at cisco.com> wrote:
> That is fine. The amount of information to be carried is easily
> extensible. So if you can help us to determine the required fields we
> will be more then glad to add them.
Deploying this as a signalling protocol that is separated from BGP may
make sense. Although the ease/speed of deployment by using BGP may make
this a worthwhile effort.
John
More information about the NANOG
mailing list