Port blocking last resort in fight against virus
Jack Bates
jbates at brightok.net
Tue Aug 12 15:36:12 UTC 2003
Sean Donelan wrote:
>
> http://computerworld.co.nz/webhome.nsf/UNID/BEC6DE12EC6AE16ECC256D8000192BF7!opendocument
>
> "While some end users are calling for ISPs to block certain ports relating
> to the Microsoft exploit as reported yesterday (Feared RPC worm starts to
> spread), most ISPs are reluctant to do so."
>
Is it just me that feels that blocking a port which is known to be used
to perform billions of scans is only proper? It takes time to contact,
clean, or suspend an account that is infected. Allowing infected systems
to continue to scan only causes problems for other networks. I see no
network performance issues, but that doesn't mean other networks won't
have issues.
-Jack
More information about the NANOG
mailing list