[connie.davis at mail.internetseer.com: answerpointe.cctec.com]

Stewart, William C (Bill), RTSLS billstewart at att.com
Sun Aug 10 22:34:24 UTC 2003


I'd say keep it.

NANOG's archives at Merit are probably more stable than
many mailing list archives I've seen, but it's possible that
something will happen to it in the next 5-10 years that kills it.
Multiple copies of list archives aren't a bad thing,
at least for relatively low volume lists like NANOG.
Old archives aren't usually highly useful, but once in a while
they can provide good insight into the "why did they do that"
sorts of questions.

The archive at gmane.org munges @ charactes into " <at> "
in an attempt to reduce spider infestations,
and it's probably not a bad idea except when people are
trying to explain specific syntaxes that this garbles.

		Bill Stewart.



More information about the NANOG mailing list