Server Redundancy
Nathan J. Mehl
memory-nanog at blank.org
Thu Aug 7 21:15:43 UTC 2003
In the immortal words of variable at ednet.co.uk (variable at ednet.co.uk):
>
> On Wed, 6 Aug 2003, Austad, Jay wrote:
> > As a side note, I've used Cisco's CSS, F5's stuff, Alteon, and Foundry. Out
> > of all of them that I've used, the Foundry had the least problems and had a
> > nicely structured config.
>
> Foundry seems to be fine for www traffic, but has serious issues with
> handling long FTP sessions. FTP works while you're in your stickiness
> period (up to 2 hours on the non-XL serveriron), but after that it will
> forget which FTP server has the control session and send your next data
> session to another server which won't recognise it. Last time I spoke to
> Foundry, this was still considered a "feature".
>
> Do other vendors handle this properly?
I recall that Resonate Central Dispatch handled this well the last
time I looked, but the last time I looked was about 3 years ago now,
so take that for what it's worth. (www.resonate.com)
-n
------------------------------------------------------------<memory at blank.org>
My goal is real simple: to write better than anyone who can write faster than
me, and faster than anyone who can write better than me. (--J.M. Straczynski)
<http://blank.org/memory/>----------------------------------------------------
More information about the NANOG
mailing list