Abuse.cc ???

Thu Apr 3 15:44:22 UTC 2003

On Thu, 03 Apr 2003 10:31:39 EST, "Steven M. Bellovin" said:

> >Correct me if I am wrong, but isn't this against RFC current practice?
> >
> 
> Yes -- see RFC 2142.  But the IETF has no enforcement arm...

That would be NANOG's job (as much as it's anybody's).  Soooo... 

http://www.rfc-ignorant.org

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 226 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20030403/92d04cac/attachment.sig>