How do you stop outgoing spam?
Dave Crocker
dhc2 at dcrocker.net
Wed Sep 18 07:01:58 UTC 2002
At 01:33 AM 9/18/2002 -0400, Barney Wolff wrote:
> > 3. SMTPAUTH does not require an alternate port, yet it is sufficient for
> > ensuring accountability. Hence it is sufficient for dealing with the
> > reason that port 25 is blocked, without requiring that it be blocked.
>
>I don't understand this reasoning. The ISP's justification for blocking
>25 except to its own servers is to avoid having its facilities used
>for abuse. How would the local ISP enforce use of SMTPAUTH to connect
>to some remote ISP?
the claim is that outbound 25 is blocked to prevent spam. however
accessing a remote 25 with smtpauth ensures full accountability and,
therefore, prevents spam. blocking 25 disables use of this mechanism.
d/
----------
Dave Crocker <mailto:dave at tribalwise.com>
TribalWise, Inc. <http://www.tribalwise.com>
tel +1.408.246.8253; fax +1.408.850.1850
More information about the NANOG
mailing list