OT: illegal? (Re: Brad's Mail) (was: Paul's Mailfrom)

Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu
Tue Sep 3 00:27:38 UTC 2002


On Tue, 03 Sep 2002 00:14:04 -0000, "E.B. Dreger" <eddy+public+spam at noc.everquick.net>  said:
> 
> BK> From: Brad Knowles <brad.knowles at skynet.be>
> BK> Subject: Re: Brad's Mail (was: Paul's Mailfrom)
> BK> X-Message-Flag: Your copy of Outlook will expire in 3 days.  Please
> BK>     contact Microsoft about purchasing a new license.  Remember: software
> BK>     piracy is a felony!
> 
> Your full headers are amusing.  Is it legal (wrong group, I know)
> to disclose information like this to third parties?  Seems rather
> slimy for a MUA to pull a stunt like that...

Yes, it's pretty slimy for an MUA to do this, but you're wrong as to what was
really going on.  Look a bit at this message in Outlook and think...
-- 
				Valdis Kletnieks
				Computer Systems Senior Engineer
				Virginia Tech

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 226 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20020902/84e8f8b1/attachment.sig>


More information about the NANOG mailing list