More federal management of key components of the Internet needed
Rick Irving
rirving at onecall.net
Thu Oct 24 01:50:01 UTC 2002
Hey, Sean, if it is against the law to yell FIRE in a crowded
movie theatre in America...
Why isn't it against the law to (s)Yell "FUD" at Congress ?
:\
Sean Donelan wrote:
>
> It's starting already.
It started with the USA Patriot Act, the beginning paroxysms of
rigor mortis
of the American Constitutional Rights under a new regime, and the
"virtual" death of the Bill of Rights....
This is just a continuation of an ongoing trend. (IMHO)
Remember, after 10 years of being declared "paranoid", and an
"Enemy of the State", Abbie Hoffman was -absolutely right-!
(CoinTelPro)
Did anyone notice that under the new laws,
-== Watergate is perfectly LEGAL ? ==-
</rant- but, let that one sink in....really.>
Yes, I know Susan... switching to on-topic. :P
>
> I don't understand how giving the US federal government management control
> of key components of the Internet will make it more secure.
Neither do I. For example, I recently received a joint FBI/DOJ
letter...
(I believe if I leave out details, I am allowed to mention this
here...)
It informed me that, 10 MONTHS AGO, a list was found that had an
-email domain-
of ours, as a -possibly- affected -server-.
(There is no such actual server, it is only an e-mail domain.. )
And, wanted me to see of there was any strange activity, somewhere
in a
4 MONTH time frame, that I could see....
Oh, BTW, they had NO information on methodology, layer 3 protocol
affected,
ports, IP's.. and stated as such. -=Nothing=-
(Not even a valid server name)
And, ONLY, 10 MONTHS after the fact!
Why, do you know in Internet Years, that would be.....
urrr.....that would be... carry the zero's...square the root,
hrmmm...
I would be DEAD ? :*
And these are the people that are going to -=improve=- security ?
How, by sentencing Perps to death by OLD AGE ? :D
> What steps could
> the US federal government take which non-governmental organizations aren't
> or couldn't do? Putting a root name server on a military base isn't
> really going to protect it from DDOS attacks.
>
> Should root servers be located in the "middle" of backbones, instead of stub
> networks? Or do networks naturally "grow" towards root servers?
>
> http://www.idg.net/ic_958962_1793_1-1681.html
> "More federal management of key components of the Internet
> infrastructure is needed, Julian and Brady agreed. That could include
> tax incentives or direct federal funding for private companies and
> public organizations managing key DNS servers to secure their systems,
> all of which are currently operated as a free service by companies,
> government entities and non-profit organizations.
>
> "This showcases a specific vulnerability that requires the government to
> get involved," Julian said. "If you run a DNS server what is your
> monetary incentive to secure it? There is none.
Wrong, the monetary incentive is that -=your=- system remains
operational,
and your network UP, and responding.... when others don't.
What, no one in congress associates "uptime" with a "monetary
advantage" in business ?
No WONDER they all bought from Enron.
* S *
(Just kidding)
> This is the number one
>> area of focus that the government should have."
I think they should be focusing on terrorist activity, if you ask
me.
* shrug *
.Richard.
-= FUD! it isn't a sales tool, it's a way of Managing a Nation. =-
"God Bless America, and the American Constitution."
I leave you with the Oath of Office of the American President:
"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will
faithfully execute the Office of the
President of the United States, and will to
the best of my ability, preserve, protect and
defend the -=constitution=- of the United
States."
Ok. One last Quote, from U2:
"A Politicians Promise on the Day of Election"
More information about the NANOG
mailing list