Sprint VS. Qwest

Richard A Steenbergen ras at e-gerbil.net
Fri Oct 18 21:44:06 UTC 2002


On Fri, Oct 18, 2002 at 12:18:47PM -0500, dgold wrote:
> 
> Both Sprint and Qwest are, most would agree, transit-free, "tier 1"
> networks. They interconnect with all other similarly large networks. How
> much more do you want? The size of their interconnections to 701? I'm not
> sure how that is useful.

http://west-boot.mfnx.net/traffic/sjc/sjc-sprint-oc3.html
http://west-boot.mfnx.net/traffic/iad/iad-sprint-oc3.html
http://west-boot.mfnx.net/traffic/chi/chi-sprint.html
http://west-boot.mfnx.net/traffic/nyc/nyc-sprint.html
http://west-boot.mfnx.net/traffic/lax/lax-sprint.html

'cause yeah, no "tier 1" has ever run congested to another, right?

-- 
Richard A Steenbergen <ras at e-gerbil.net>       http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
PGP Key ID: 0x138EA177  (67 29 D7 BC E8 18 3E DA  B2 46 B3 D8 14 36 FE B6)



More information about the NANOG mailing list